SONY WH-CH700N vs. Symphonized Wraith 2.0 Comparison
What is the difference between SONY WH-CH700N and Symphonized Wraith 2.0? Find out which headphone is better and their overall performance in the detailed comparison.
| Overview |
 SONY WH-CH700N |   Symphonized Wraith 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | View Price | View Price |
| Summary | We are delighted to inform you about SONY WH-CH700N Wireless Noise Cancelling Headphone Review (Pros & Cons). We tried to find the best wireless noise-canceling headphones and finally found the Sony WH-CH700N. The price is affordable, and the overall perfect quality sound. |
|
| Review Box | ||
| Technical Specifications: | ||
| Weight | 241 Gram | 14.9 ounces (422 g) |
| Noise Cancelling | Yes | — |
| Connection Type | Wireless Bluetooth | — |
| Wireless Range | 40 feet approximately | 10M/32 FT |
| Touch Control | No | — |
| Volume Control | Yes | — |
| Product Size | 8.71 x 2.72 x 10.28 inches | — |
| 3 5mm | Yes | — |
| Playback Time | Up to 35 hours (wireless, NC on) Up to 40 hours (wireless, NC off) Up to 50 hours (wired, NC on) | — |
| Batteries | 1 Lithium Polymer batteries required. (included) | 1 Lithium-ion battery required. (included) |
| Battery Charging Port | USB | — |
| Impedance Ohm | 48 ohm | — |
| Frequency Response | 7-20k Hz | 18Hz-22kHz |
| Sensitivity | 97 dB | 107+/3bD at 1KHz, 1mW |
| Warranty | 1 Year | — |
| Headphones Size | — | 10.16 x 7.64 x 3.15 inches |
| Headphones Fit | — | Over-ear |
| Driver | — | Dynamic 40mm Neodymium |
| Impedance | — | 32 ohms |
| Connectivity | — | Wireless Bluetooth & Wired |
| Audio Jack | — | 3.5mm gold-plated jack |
| Cable | — | 48" Innovative shield technology cable |
| Color | — | Walnut |
| Customer Reviews | — | 4.2 out of 5 stars by 539 ratings (as of 01-October-2020) |
| Extra Features | — | Noise-Isolating |
| Verdict & Action | Choose SONY WH-CH700N if you prioritize lightweight comfort for extended listening sessions, optimized impedance that works great without a dedicated amp, and expert-rated sound quality and build craftsmanship. View Full Review | Choose Symphonized Wraith 2.0 if you prioritize versatile wired and wireless connectivity options, a roomier fit with better noise isolation and comfort, and efficient, high-volume output from any device. View Full Review |
PROS & CONS COMPARISON
Side-by-side strengths and weaknesses evaluation
- 35 hours battery of wireless use with noise cancellation
- 10 minutes quick charge for up to 65 minutes use
- All over the best budget SONY Wireless Noise Cancellation Headphone
- Don't have Amazon Alexa Control
- Don't have Touch Control
- Adjustable headband
- Very strong & sturdy
- Deep bass sound quality
- Best for gaming and music
- Sound poor in low-frequency level.
Summary & Interactive Insights
Key Takeaways At-a-Glance
- Performance Tradeoff: SONY WH-CH700N excels in Weight (241 Gram vs 14.9 ounces (422 g)), Impedance (48 ohm vs 32 ohms), whereas Symphonized Wraith 2.0 leads in Connectivity Technology (Wireless Bluetooth & Wired vs Wireless Bluetooth), Headset Size (10.16 x 7.64 x 3.15 inches vs 8.71 x 2.72 x 10.28 inches), giving each model distinct strengths depending on your priorities.
- Pricing & Value: Evaluating value between these models comes down to whether you prioritize long-term durability or feature versatility.
- Core Recommendation: Opt for SONY WH-CH700N if you prioritize weight and impedance, or choose Symphonized Wraith 2.0 for connectivity technology and headset size.
SONY WH-CH700N is best for:
Tailored for listeners who prioritize lightweight 241g build ideal for extended listening sessions, wireless connectivity for cable-free convenience, active noise cancellation for immersive, distraction-free listening.
Symphonized Wraith 2.0 is best for:
Tailored for listeners who prioritize ultra-lightweight 14g design for fatigue-free all-day wear, wireless connectivity for cable-free convenience, 40mm balanced drivers for rich audio detail.
Personalize Your Winner
Adjust the priority sliders below based on what matters most to you to instantly recalculate the winner.
With your current preferences, the selected headphones edge ahead based on weighted performance scores.
Why is SONY WH-CH700N compared with Symphonized Wraith 2.0?
Where Symphonized Wraith 2.0 and SONY WH-CH700N actually differ.
| Metric | SONY WH-CH700N | Symphonized Wraith 2.0 | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity Technology | Wireless Bluetooth | Wireless Bluetooth & Wired | |
| Bluetooth Version | 4.1 | — | EVEN |
| Driver Size | None / Not Specified | Dynamic 40mm Neodymium | EVEN |
| Headset Size | 8.71 x 2.72 x 10.28 inches -1.45 in | 10.16 x 7.64 x 3.15 inches +1.45 in | |
| Weight | 241 Gram -181.4g | 14.9 ounces (422 g) +181.4g | |
| Impedance | 48 ohm +1.5X | 32 ohms -1.5X | |
| Sensitivity | 97 dB -10dB | 107+/3bD at 1KHz, 1mW +10dB | |
| Battery Life | USB | None / Not Specified | EVEN |
| Waterproof | None / Not Specified | None / Not Specified | EVEN |
| Special Features Availability | None / Not Specified | Noise-Isolating | EVEN |
| Review Box Score | 8.4 / 10 +0.4 | 8 / 10 -0.4 | |
| Overall Score | 80/100 | 80/100 | EVEN |
🤝 Result: It's a Tie!
Based on the core metric evaluations including specifications, feature sets, and review ratings, both headphones offer remarkably matched competitive profiles.
Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons
Browse other popular headphone face-offs and side-by-side performance reviews featuring SONY WH-CH700N or Symphonized Wraith 2.0.
