SONY WH-CH700N vs. Symphonized Wraith 2.0 Comparison
What is the difference between SONY WH-CH700N and Symphonized Wraith 2.0? Find out which headphone is better and their overall performance in the detailed comparison.
| Overview |
SONY WH-CH700N |
Symphonized Wraith 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | View Price | View Price |
| Summary | We are delighted to inform you about SONY WH-CH700N Wireless Noise Cancelling Headphone Review (Pros & Cons). We tried to find the best wireless noise-canceling headphones and finally found the Sony WH-CH700N. The price is affordable, and the overall perfect quality sound. |
|
| Review Box | ||
| Technical Specifications: | ||
| Weight | 241 Gram | 14.9 ounces (422 g) |
| Noise Cancelling | Yes | — |
| Connection Type | Wireless Bluetooth | — |
| Wireless Range | 40 feet approximately | 10M/32 FT |
| Touch Control | No | — |
| Volume Control | Yes | — |
| Product Size | 8.71 x 2.72 x 10.28 inches | — |
| 3 5mm | Yes | — |
| Playback Time | Up to 35 hours (wireless, NC on) Up to 40 hours (wireless, NC off) Up to 50 hours (wired, NC on) | — |
| Batteries | 1 Lithium Polymer batteries required. (included) | 1 Lithium-ion battery required. (included) |
| Battery Charging Port | USB | — |
| Impedance Ohm | 48 ohm | — |
| Frequency Response | 7-20k Hz | 18Hz-22kHz |
| Sensitivity | 97 dB | 107+/3bD at 1KHz, 1mW |
| Warranty | 1 Year | — |
| Headphones Size | — | 10.16 x 7.64 x 3.15 inches |
| Headphones Fit | — | Over-ear |
| Driver | — | Dynamic 40mm Neodymium |
| Impedance | — | 32 ohms |
| Connectivity | — | Wireless Bluetooth & Wired |
| Audio Jack | — | 3.5mm gold-plated jack |
| Cable | — | 48" Innovative shield technology cable |
| Color | — | Walnut |
| Customer Reviews | — | 4.2 out of 5 stars by 539 ratings (as of 01-October-2020) |
| Extra Features | — | Noise-Isolating |
| Verdict & Action | View Full Review | View Full Review |
PROS & CONS COMPARISON
Side-by-side strengths and weaknesses evaluation
- Clear voice pickup during hands-free calls
- Ergonomic fatigue-free ear cushions
- Lightweight frame for extended wearing sessions
- Slightly higher weight distribution on crown
- Earcups can feel warm during extended sessions
- Ergonomic fatigue-free ear cushions
- Stable wireless pairing with low audio delay
- Clear voice pickup during hands-free calls
- Lacks companion app equalizer customization
- Control buttons require firm actuation
Summary & Interactive Insights
Key Takeaways At-a-Glance
- Performance Tradeoff: SONY WH-CH700N provides higher overall versatility for everyday media playback, while Symphonized Wraith 2.0 focuses on a specialized listening profile for target acoustic environments.
- Pricing & Value: SONY WH-CH700N and Symphonized Wraith 2.0 deliver strong relative value within their classes, offering flexible choices across performance and price flexibility.
- Core Recommendation: Go with SONY WH-CH700N for targeted acoustic performance in primary listening scenarios, or pick Symphonized Wraith 2.0 for alternative driver response and lightweight comfort.
SONY WH-CH700N is best for:
Engineered with specialized acoustic drivers to provide dynamic soundstages, fatigue-free wearing experiences, and reliable connectivity.
Symphonized Wraith 2.0 is best for:
Designed for listeners seeking high-resolution clarity, versatile media compatibility, and robust structural longevity across daily use.
Personalize Your Winner
Adjust the priority sliders below based on what matters most to you to instantly recalculate the winner.
With your current preferences, the selected headphones edge ahead based on weighted performance scores.
Why is SONY WH-CH700N compared with Symphonized Wraith 2.0?
Where Symphonized Wraith 2.0 and SONY WH-CH700N actually differ.
| Metric | SONY WH-CH700N | Symphonized Wraith 2.0 | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity Technology | Wireless Bluetooth | Wireless Bluetooth & Wired | |
| Bluetooth Version | None / Not Specified | None / Not Specified | EVEN |
| Driver Size | None / Not Specified | Dynamic 40mm Neodymium | EVEN |
| Headset Size | 8.71 x 2.72 x 10.28 inches -1.45 in | 10.16 x 7.64 x 3.15 inches +1.45 in | |
| Weight | 241 Gram -181.4g | 14.9 ounces (422 g) +181.4g | |
| Impedance | 48 ohm +1.5X | 32 ohms -1.5X | |
| Sensitivity | 97 dB -10dB | 107+/3bD at 1KHz, 1mW +10dB | |
| Battery Life | USB | None / Not Specified | EVEN |
| Waterproof | None / Not Specified | None / Not Specified | EVEN |
| Special Features Availability | None / Not Specified | Noise-Isolating | EVEN |
| Review Box Score | 8.4 / 10 +0.4 | 8 / 10 -0.4 | |
| Overall Score | 80/100 | 80/100 | EVEN |
🤝 Result: It's a Tie!
Based on the core metric evaluations including specifications, feature sets, and review ratings, both headphones offer remarkably matched competitive profiles.
Similar Head-to-Head Comparisons
Browse other popular headphone face-offs and side-by-side performance reviews featuring SONY WH-CH700N or Symphonized Wraith 2.0.
